Anyway....
So I've been reading "Yours, Jack" by C.S. Lewis; mainly it's a bunch of published letters to his friends and colleagues. One responds to his old-time and long-time friend Arthur Greaves (hot name, there), who had mused in a prior letter (apparantly) about whether or not God contains evil. Lewis ends up saying 'he does' and 'he doesn't,' and gives the following analogy:
"Suppose you are taking a dog on a lead through a turnstile or past a post. You know what happens. He tries to go the wrong side and gets the lead looped round the post. You see that he can't do it, and therefore pull him back. You pull him back because you want to enable him to go forward. he wants exactly the same thing-namely to go forward: for that very reason he resists your pull back, or, if he is an obedient dog, yields to it reluctantly as a matter of duty which seems to him to be quite in opposition to his own will: though in fact it is only by yielding to you that he will ever succeed in getting where he wants."
I assume anyone who doesn't understand what 'obedient' means in the Christian sense will miss the point of this and focus too much on humans being compared to dogs. All I have to say to that is that in dogs is a trait called 'loyalty,' a trait in humans that shows up in only the most noble and decent of characters; even dogs can teach us something.
But back to what Lewis said. Later in the letter, he says, "The truth is that evil is not a real thing at all, like God. It is simply good spoiled. That is why I say there can be good without evil, but no evil without good. You know what the biologists mean by a parasite-an animal that lives on another animal. Evil is a parasite. It is there only because good is there for it to spoil and confuse."
Lewis also talks about how in every evil or horrible thing we do there is a goodness that is just ill-expressed. I think this is all very interesting, and amazingly practical (if I can use that word). It assumes that there is a good and a bad, first of all (a big step for most people nowadays it seems), and really shows a very good way to think about things we feel guilty about or know are bad. Looking for the good in bad situations isn't just looking for the 'silver lining,' but instead it's searching for what is truly there inside of us. "Bad" or "being a jerk" or "doing something stupid" is just us getting confused about what's really going on inside of ourselves. We're all here trying to, almost obsessing over, express what we don't understand, what lies inside of us and at the heart of the universe, really. People can slap a paintbrust against a wall for days, but until they actually try to express that thing they're not going to start making art. Talking to people is just rattling off our wants and needs until we sit down and listen, and then try to both express what we hear inside and also understand that everyone else is just in the same boat.
The other day Mike McCaffery gave me a good quote (sorry if I mess it up a bit). It's about chess and goes something like, "I started winning decisive games when I realized that not only was I scared of losing, but the other guy was too." A correlary to this would be: "You can only really, truly live if you not only understand while you're trying to express the unexpressable, but everyone else in the world is too."
Well, there are some thoughts, muffled around a bit since I thought them.
